Analysis of the anti-communist theory of physicist Viktor Katyushik #004
And since gasoline does not have a clean and white past for its extraction and transportation, then the price for it will be low, they say, it will be a discount for not disclosing a criminal past for theft.
It turns out that for the stolen remnants of someone else's gasoline, the citizens of the communist state will not receive too much money. But even if these big finances are obtained by thieves, what should these individuals do with the ill-earned money? It makes no sense for such people to go back to their country, because they may be caught stealing and punished. It is also not possible for such people to buy anything in a communist state, especially with criminal money. Such individuals will also not want to stay in a non-communist country, because they already have the housing space allocated to them by the state, a vehicle, food, water and other aspects of life.
That is, in fact, the citizens of a communist state can only pay their country in the form of some kind of labor – and even then only if it is not a very developed country. Otherwise, the working hours will be minimal, and the work itself – or rather, the work activity – will consist in providing services that cannot yet be transferred to robots. And such work, in fact, will not even be called labor – rather, it is just a highly qualified activity. And where there are high qualifications, large working hours are usually not required, which frees up a lot of time for personal development and self–education - well, if, of course, the person himself wants to do all this.
So if you think about it, the communist regime doesn't seem to be something bad. But this is only the case when the government supports the principles of humanity. It's just that if the state controls most spheres of life, then unkind rulers may be tempted to take control of everything, including the citizens themselves. Such a policy exists at the time of the 21st century in some communist countries, and people cannot even escape from these countries because the entire population is under the strictest control. So an acceptable option would be to maintain a certain golden mean, when the human population is offered certain amenities with the condition of providing their labor, but at the same time strict control is not carried out at the level of each individual. https://xbae.ch/
It turns out that for the stolen remnants of someone else's gasoline, the citizens of the communist state will not receive too much money. But even if these big finances are obtained by thieves, what should these individuals do with the ill-earned money? It makes no sense for such people to go back to their country, because they may be caught stealing and punished. It is also not possible for such people to buy anything in a communist state, especially with criminal money. Such individuals will also not want to stay in a non-communist country, because they already have the housing space allocated to them by the state, a vehicle, food, water and other aspects of life.
That is, in fact, the citizens of a communist state can only pay their country in the form of some kind of labor – and even then only if it is not a very developed country. Otherwise, the working hours will be minimal, and the work itself – or rather, the work activity – will consist in providing services that cannot yet be transferred to robots. And such work, in fact, will not even be called labor – rather, it is just a highly qualified activity. And where there are high qualifications, large working hours are usually not required, which frees up a lot of time for personal development and self–education - well, if, of course, the person himself wants to do all this.
So if you think about it, the communist regime doesn't seem to be something bad. But this is only the case when the government supports the principles of humanity. It's just that if the state controls most spheres of life, then unkind rulers may be tempted to take control of everything, including the citizens themselves. Such a policy exists at the time of the 21st century in some communist countries, and people cannot even escape from these countries because the entire population is under the strictest control. So an acceptable option would be to maintain a certain golden mean, when the human population is offered certain amenities with the condition of providing their labor, but at the same time strict control is not carried out at the level of each individual. https://xbae.ch/
Festival International du Journalisme : des conférences et débats à déguster